1. He was convicted of shooting Charles R. clark
2. He said that he was at his girlfriends house and that someone else did the killing. He also said "I didn't shoot nobody".
3. In october 2005 brown went to death row.
4. Wednesday, may 14th, 2014 was when this was published.
5.His girlfriends house.
6. He said that he was making a call but really he was at someones house, his girlfriends house chilling with the guy who actually did the crime.
7. They found the phone logs from the apartment.
8. The document was the phone logs, they didn't turn over the evidence.
9. They said that they would sign a order or a new trial.
10. Everyone is entitled to a fair trial.
11. the story ends for brown on a sour note. Jail isn't fun.
12. The style of thus article is about an event that happened and I don't think that it is very personal.
5. The house is not itself an alibi. He claimed he was at his girlfriend's apartment and that a phone call he made to her at work would prove that he was there.
ReplyDelete6. OK so you actually answered No. 5 here, but why did the alibi fail to convince jurors? His lawyers presented no evidence to substantiate the claim, and most murder suspects present an alibi, so jurors were not persuaded by it. Plus the testimony of his girlfriend did not help his case. She testified against him (under pressure she said later).
8. No the second document was a request from the prosecutors to turn over the phone logs.
9. No the appeals court did NOTHING for almost a year.
11. But how do you think the story ends. Do you think he gets a fair trial and is proven innocent or do you think his story ends with his execution?
12. But there are personal, informal touches. Short sentences and paragraphs and even functional fragments that would not be in more formal writing.
You did not answer these questions very carefully or accurately, I'm afraid.
87