1. The strategy that the author is using is imagery and how you can just tell by looking at them what they have done.
2. The two trends are, while expansion of others industries often leads to higher wages and greater opportunities, growth in the restaurant businesses does not.
3. The economic argument is that higher wages would result in fewer jobs
4.Concern for the children of workers, and its the single most effective way to combat income inequality in a country where the gap of rich and poor is soaring.
5. The restaurant industry represents 10% of the work force they have the lowest wages.
6.Consumers shouldn't support the restaurants who have low wages for workers. law makers say that the reject of demands of the NRA should be rejected.
7.The NRA is allowing workers to get payed less.
8. Restaurants owners blame low wages and poor working condition and low wages.
9. Counters the claims that raising wages wouldn't change the board of competitions.
10. Boston workers work multiple jobs because the pay rate is so low s they can't support their family.
11. Roberto moved from san salvador, this describes a personal experience and how the story isn't just a bunch of facts but its actually has some real life examples.
12. They are breaking the law because they are giving them less then minimum wage, for some reason they can pass by doing this.
13. wage theft is common
14. He wants the office to open and to operate with less red tape, over head could be reduced. And the could allow more pay
15. The conclusion paragraph is written with a bunch of facts and a real life story. The she says a little message almost appointed to her main audience the restaurant workers.
1. But what about the second part of the question: how does it serve to hook the reader? That's important.
ReplyDelete2. No. The trends are (1) growth in the restaurant industry (2) increase in wage inequality. They are related because restaurant workers are paid worse that any other workers.
3. Yes, that is the argument, but how does she dismiss that argument. Hint: the answer involves California.
4. You got two out of the four: fairness, will save taxpayers money.
5. There are five specific statistics that you leave out of this answer.
6. Your sentence on lawmakers makes no sense. Lawmakers should reject the National Restaurant Industry demand for a tipped minimum wage.
7. How are they allowing this? You need to explain the tipped minimum wage.
8. This sentence makes no sense. How can you blame low wages and poor working conditions on low wages?
9. What is the board of competitions? The article says that raising wages "across the board" would not cause lost jobs because all restaurants would have to play by the same new wage rules.
10. Good answer. Yea!
11. Another winner.
12. There is a bit more than just this. They fail to pay overtime, the violate child labor laws, and sometimes they don't pay workers at all.
13. How common? That's the question.
14. Also deny permit renewals to restaurants guilty of wage theft.
15. I think I agree with what you say here but your sentence doesn't make sense.
Claire: You clearly went through the motions on this one. A lot of your answers could have been correct if you had just read over your answers before posting them. Some other answers are incomplete or just plain wrong. You can do better.
80